



|
|
(517)
467-6145 e-mail us
STRUCTURAL
INSPECTION - Overstressed basement wall
I.
Descriptions: 2 of 3
Inspection was carried out on 3/12/01.
This inspection is limited to the
foundation
wall being replaced, and the attachment
of the structure to the foundation wall.
The house is new construction, and is
located on a rural lot.
The structure is a one storey residential
house on a poured concrete wall basement,
and is rectangular in plan with full
walkout along one long edge. The opposite
wall,
(north) which must retain earth, is
nominally 9' tall and 8" thick. It
runs 62 ft
without any buttressing. The porch
foundation wall could have acted as a
buttress, but
it was not tied in with reinforcing bar.
The east and west walls are 32 ft long.
Our best information is that the walls
have no vertical reinforcing, and some
horizontal reinforcing.
Sometime after backfill the north and
east walls showed excessive lateral
movement
at the top, and excessive cracking. The
backfill material has been removed and
the
walls have not moved back to original
plumb.
II. Observations:
The house is anchored to the foundation
wall with tie straps embedded into the
top
of the foundation wall at 6 ft spacings.
Assuming light soil pressure for sandy
backfill, 405 lb/ft lateral resistance is
needed at the top of the wall. Friction
may be
able to resist 50 or so of the 405 plf.
This would leave 2130 lb. sideways on
each strap. The straps have deformed ex-
cessively, gouging into the 2x6 base
plate. The best installation involves
running the
straps up through centered holes in the
plate, then bending them over the top and
down the sides. The installed straps were
bent under the plate, and up the sides.
This
configuration may have less strength, and
will exhibit greater deformation under
lateral load. Cracks in the concrete
propagate diagonally from each strap -
indicating
that the straps are (or were)
transferring significant lateral force.
In the best possible case, the straps can
transfer about 480 lb. each - as limited
by the
wood plate's crushing resistance. This
would indicate that the straps must be no
more
than about 1'-4" o.c.
The Michigan Building Code calls for a
minimum 10" thick wall for this
application.
(Ref: Table 1805.5(1)) Thicker or
reinforced walls may be needed depending
on
properties of backfill material. If an
8" wall is used, it must be an
engineered,
reinforced wall. The wall was not built
to Code requirements, and would likely
have
had performance problems even with proper
top attachment. Calculations show the
unreinforced concrete will go into
tension - unacceptable under the ACI
specification.
III. Conclusions: 3 of 3
- The wall is not safe and must be
rebuilt.
- The porch foundation must be tied to
main wall with appropriate reinforcing
steel.
- The anchors must be installed at a much
closer spacing, in order to transfer the
lateral
force into the floor diaphragm. Install
anchors per manufacturer directions.
Consideration should be given to the use
of steel rod anchor bolts in the rebuilt
wall,
instead of straps.
- Rebuilt foundation wall must be in
conformance with MBC. Given the trouble
so
far, and the difficulty in knowing actual
basement wall pressures in general, It is
recommended that a reinforced concrete
wall be designed, or at least any
proposed
design be reviewed by the Engineer, and
submitted to the Building Inspector,
prior
to construction.

Contact
Information
- Telephone:
- (517)
467-6145
- FAX:
- (517)
467-2220
-
- Postal
address:
-
- Structural
Solutions LLC
- 8466 Slee
Rd.
- Onsted, MI
49265
- Electronic
mail:
General Information:
Thomas R. Price,
P.E.

[ Home ] [ Engineering Services ] [ Gallery of Projects ] [ Request For Quote ] [ Resources ]
Copyright ©
2007 Structural Solutions LLC, 8466 Slee Rd.
Onsted, MI 49265 Lenawee County
|